|
Speech
of the People’s Advocate of the Republic of Albania,
Proff.
Ermir Dobjani in
the Conference of the PABSEC Ombudsman
Istanbul,
26 April 2006
The
Role of the Ombudsman Institution in consolidating democracy
Dear
Mr./Ms. Chair
Dear
Colleagues
I
would like to take this advantage
and express my thanks to the organizers of this
Conference for the invitation and the opportunity they have
given me to make a
brief presentation of the Albanian People`s Advocate
Institution, which
I have been leading for
6 years.
The
Constitution of the Republic of Albania, adopted on November 28,
1998, following eight years of democratic changes, envisaged for
the first time the Institution of the People’s Advocate
(Ombudsman), as a national instance, guarantee of democracy
through the genuine protection granted to the fundamental human
rights and freedoms in Albania.
Based on the Constitution of the Republic of Albania,
wherein the duties, status and powers of the Ombudsman are
determined in five articles therein, in February 1999, the
Albanian Parliament adopted the Law No. 8454, dated 04 February
1999 “On People's Advocate (Ombudsman)”.
In
the Law No. 8600, dated 10 April 2000,
a supplement was made
in the article 35 with the view to strengthening the
independence of the People`s Advocate
towards Government by entitling the People’s Advocate
to determine the structure, staff number, the specific qualities
and qualifications, while the remuneration is regulated with a
governmental decision.
The
People's Advocate office consists of three specialized sections.
responsible for the respective complaints and requests.
First
Section, responsible
for complaints against the central governmental bodies, local
governmental bodies, and third parties working on their behalf.
Second
Section,
responsible for complaints against police, secret intelligence
service, prisons, armed forces, and judiciary.
Third Section handles
cases, which are not included in the first two sections,
likewise collaborating with the NGOs, and carries out researches
relevant to the area of human rights and freedoms
Since
2005 it has been set up the Subsection for Children’s Rights
within our Institution. In May 2005 some other supplements were
made to the law “On the People’s Advocate”, further
strengthening the position of the People`s Advocate by entitling
him to suspend the administrative acts till his recommendation
is scrutinized.
The
Albanian law for
the People’s Advocate is
a combination of the Danish, Swedish and Polish law.
By
the end of 90-ies, when the establishment of the People`s
Advocate Institution was still under discussion, before the
approval of the constitution took place, some surveys conducted
by some NGO-s had concluded that the Ombudsman was unknown to
the major part of the people interviewed including here Albanian
lawyers and sociologists.
For
the establishment of the Institution of the Albanian People`s
Advocate were engaged some of the international bodies,
especially the Council of Europe and OSCE. The international
pressure helpful for the establishment of the democratic
institutions, following the financial support to Albania, was
associated positively with a coordinated support through
consultancy, thrashing out ideas, supporting initiatives and
moreover through financial guarantees for this new institution.
The establishment of the Institution of the People`s Advocate in
Albania is
absolutely the product of the democratic discretion of the
Albanian political forces to be open minded at the increasing
requirements of the International Community and get involved in
the European integration process.
It
is certain that, the keystone contribution to defining a clear
vision of the People’s Advocate Institution activity was
provided by DANIDA
project of the Danish Government for Albania, aiming at
establishing, strengthening and consolidating our Office.
Since
the very beginning, the People’s Advocate was concentrated on
the solution of some complaints regarding issues affecting a big
number of citizens in Albania. To give a solution to these
complaints meant that the People`s Advocate should intervene to
the main state institutions or provide recommendations on the
improvement of legislation for positive results. An example is
the complaint of an ex-landowner, expropriated by the communist
regime, whose land property was used by the communist state to
build a factory, which at present was under the process of
privatization. The landowner was invited to become a shareholder
but the value of his land property and consequently the value of
his share was very low decided by a decision taken by the
Government. This was an open violation of the right to property,
therefore the People’s Advocate recommended to the Government
to change its decision on the question. The government refused
to consider our Recommendation, so the People’s Advocate had
to refer the case to the Constitutional Court. The
Constitutional Court considered the case as a flagrant violation
of human rights and invalidated the decision of the Government
as it was recommended by the People`s Advocate. The solution
given to a complaint in favour of the complainant was an
advantage to hundreds of ex-landowners in Albania. This had its
reflection in the law of the year 2004 on the restitution and
compensation of
properties to ex- landowners.
You
can understand the positive impact of this case to the Albanian
public opinion thinking that a very new institution like the
People`s Advocate “taught a good lesson to the Government”.
All this had an effect upon all other institutions of the
Albanian public administration which learned that the
recommendations of the People’s Advocate must be considered,
respected and implemented. There have been other similar cases
encountered and resolved.
In
six year activity the People’s Advocate staff has faced an
increasing workload, amounting to approximately 19 200
complaints, with an average of 23 per cent being solved
positively, i.e in favour
of the citizens.
The
main challenge of the Institution of the
People’s Advocate, since the year 2000, has been the
establishment of an independent service
system for the citizens whose rights were eventually
violated by the public administration.
Therefore,
we had to set up within the Institution such a system which
would be ready and willing to assist at any time the citizens
submitting complaints, or making any request, without hindering
them, thereby making them feel comfortable and welcome, and
immediately benefit from the Institution's services, the way
they deserve and expect from our administration. To meet the
target of enhancing the quality level of services provided to
citizens by our Office, we have adapted patterns of other
counterpart offices in Europe. In June 2001, the Complaints and
Public Relations Office has commenced functioning. It is in this
Office that the citizens, at any time during the visiting hours,
can submit their complaints, or requests, likewise be given the
appropriate explanations by one of the office experts. This
system has been adopted according to the model followed by the
Ombudsman's Office of Catalonia Province in Spain. Consequently,
the number of complaints beyond the jurisdiction and competency
of the People's Advocate has been reduced.
As
a way to a direct communication with the public,
during the year 2002, we started to
implement a new experience, so called “Open Days”.
Under
the circumstances of an ever increasing decentralization in
favour of the local Government competency, People’s Advocate
thinks that the problems should be given a solution at the place
where they appear and with the
people who purposely
or due to their lack of knowledge
bring them about.
We
have considered the practice of “Open Days” as very
efficient that reduces
considerably the bureaucratic procedures, the long routs to
Tirana, the financial costs and
why not the abuses
with the citizens rights, by resulting in the citizens becoming
more trustful of the state, institutions and the legislation.
Jurisdiction
of this new National Human Right Institution of Albania covers a
wide range of issues, affecting the human right dimension in our
country. Ombudsman intervention for improving the voters list
and clearing it from the passed away people, Ombudsman
intervention for preventing the law violators from being
repeatedly part of election commissions, and still, appointment
of the Ombudsman representative to the top of media monitoring
board during the election process, are contribution of the
Ombudsman for the current election situation in Albania.
Human
rights abuses by the police have always been
a priority to this office. During six years of activity,
as many as 100 police officers have been punished upon
Ombudsman`s recommendation, for violating and abusing human
rights.
I
wish to bring to the attention of this audience, just an
example, which accounts for the
intervention of the Albanian Ombudsman
making possible to exhume someone corpse to reach
the conclusion that his death was caused by the police
ill-treatment and not from alcohol overdose, as it was claimed
initially by the police
themselves and the prosecutor’s office. Consequently, five
police officers were put behind bars, avoiding as such an
example of impunity, and simultaneously preventing a conflict
between the police and the people.
The
People’s Advocate has recently given a very good contribution
in dealing with cases on the trafficked children and has
cooperated with the Greek Ombudsman on this question.
The
Institution of the People’ s Advocate has been operating for 6
years in Albania by giving its contribution to enhance the good
governance practices. It ensures an observation over the
administrative performance
of the governing bodies and
public authorities, of haw
they are at the service of their taxpayers. The
People’s Advocate goal, in all this daily interaction, is the
respecting of fundamental
human rights and freedoms of the individuals, and eventually the
redressing of the
individual’ s right violated by the public administration employee.
In
this sense, in addition to protecting human rights, one of its
principal targets is the development of what is labelled
as the culture of good governance. It implies good
administration, openness, transparency, and accountability on
the part of the public administration to the taxpayers paying
taxes to support it. The People's Advocate, through his
recommendations, tries to educate the public administration,
hence making it aware of the real role it has to play in
relation to citizens, that is focus on the factual reason of its
existence, respectively the status of civil servants paid by the
citizens, rather than that of stingy ownership of the citizens'
rights.
In
a state anticipated to function under the principles of the
limited powers, as the democratic model requires, the handling
of cases is just a challenge to face, and this is what we are
trying to do as best, by interacting with the civil society,
media, human rights institutions and government institutions.
In
conclusion out of this brief presentation, we can say that in
case the transition democracies are required to consolidate the
democratic process, as well as to accomplish good governance and
respect for human rights, consequently it implies that the role
of the People's Advocate (Ombudsman) will become increasingly
significant. The skilfulness and capacity of the Albanian State
towards efficiently exercising its responsibilities in
protecting the citizen's rights primarily shall depend on the
authority and powerfulness of the institutions in the country.
Experience
has shown that in the countries of fragile democracy like ours,
the democratic institutions can be set up from the
foundation.
Thank
you for your attention.
|